المساعد الشخصي الرقمي

مشاهدة النسخة كاملة : " Criminal lawyer how flawed evidence cross-examinationCriminal defen



أسواق
26-11-2012, 06:10 AM
Criminal lawyer how flawed evidence cross-examination?(L) investigators to torture to extract confessions, threatening, luring, deception and other illegal methods from the defendant and his accomplice to obtain confessions, in violation of "criminal law" forty-third clause "and the Ministry of Public Security issued by the public security organs to handle criminal cases procedures" in 181st and the Supreme People's Court on the implementation of the " (http://www.columbiajpsalecoat.com)Chinese" the people's Republic of China Law of criminal procedure > to explain a number of problems (for Trial Implementation) "the provisions of article fifty-eighth.(2) questioning minors, without hindering the investigation or unable to inform the situation without informing their parents,?????????? ??? (http://www.louboutinbuutusale.com/products_new.html), guardians or teacher to interrogate suspects without knowing,belstaff?? (http://www.belstaffbaggusalejpshop.com/products_all.html); deaf deaf,????? ?? (http://www.asicsjpshoes.com/), mute gesture participants; questioning cannot Xiao local of the suspects, not equipped with translators; these are in violation of the Ministry of public security of “ Provisions on the procedures prescribed in article 182nd of &rdquo.(3) the interrogation record modification and correction or modification of office without the defendant (the suspect) signature or fingerprint, in violation of the Ministry of public security procedures “ ” rule 184th.(4) the accused during the investigation se confession by the investigation organ and disproof, no timely check, according to law, in violation of the Ministry of public security procedures “ ” the provisions of article 168th above, is using torture to extract confessions or threatening, luring, deception and other illegal methods to obtain evidence, should make clear that it is illegal according to the court, and the “ ” the provisions of article fifty-eighth,monster beats (http://www.monsterheadphonejp.com/), deny it as the verdict according to the,?????? ????????? (http://www.belstaffjphuku.com/).Related articles: http://forum.ampm.co.id/showthread.p...084#post260084 (http://forum.ampm.co.id/showthread.php?t=15018&p=260084#post260084) http://forum.o33.com/showthread.php?p=927987#post927987 http://forum.o33.com/showthread.php?p=927986#post927986